Three ways to watch your AI visibility, three levels of reliability. We compare the approaches honestly — naming no competitor, inventing no number — so you can see what each one actually measures.
Checking by hand is still useful to get a first sense: you quickly see whether the AI already cites your brand or not. The problem isn't asking a question, it's re-asking it the same way, everywhere, over time.
An answer seen on Monday can change by Tuesday. Five engines, ten customer questions and a monthly check already mean hundreds of verifications to note by hand — with no average position, no share of voice, no usable history.
SEO and GEO target two different arenas. The first optimizes a list of ten blue links; the second, a single answer phrased by the AI. Ranking well in Google doesn't guarantee being cited by ChatGPT, and vice versa.
The two are complementary: keep your SEO tool for organic traffic. But to know what AI assistants say about you, you need a dedicated measure — exactly the gap GEO console fills.
Where the manual test gives a snapshot and the SEO tool a ranking of links, GEO console produces a stable, comparable measure: the same questions, asked the same way, tracked over time. You see not only whether you're cited, but where, by whom and how often.
On the Pro plan, results are stabilized across multiple runs: each question is re-run to smooth out the AIs' natural variability and produce a number you can decide on. The full metrics are on the features page.
Looking for named, sourced comparisons instead? See how GEO console compares to other tools.
E-commerce stores, software vendors, local brands and agencies steering their clients' visibility all find a common landmark: a search-console-style dashboard, readable by an executive and an SEO lead alike. See concrete scenarios on the use cases page.
Capability by capability, what each approach actually lets you measure.
| Capability | Manual checking | Classic SEO tool | GEO console |
|---|---|---|---|
| Measures citations inside AI answers | ~Possible by eye, one answer at a time | ✕No — measures links, not answers | ✓Yes — that's its very purpose |
| Covers the 5 engines (ChatGPT, Gemini, Claude, Perplexity, Grok) | ~Only those you open one by one | ✕No — focused on Google SERPs | ✓Yes — all 5 on the Pro plan |
| Share of voice vs competitors | ✕Unmanageable by hand | ✕Not on AI answers | ✓Yes — included from Pro |
| Brand position in the answer | ✕No quantified measure | ✕Measures rank in the SERP | ✓Yes — average position in the answer |
| Trigger prompts identified | ~You guess and note them yourself | ✕Keywords, not AI prompts | ✓Yes — the prompts that cite you |
| History over time | ✕Archive it manually | ✓Yes, but on Google positions | ✓Yes — AI visibility trends |
| Stabilized multi-run results | ✕One answer = one snapshot | ✕Not applicable to AI answers | ✓Yes — multiple runs on the Pro plan |
✓ available · ~ possible but limited · ✕ not covered. A comparison of approaches, with no reference to any third-party product. Full engine and plan details are on the pricing page.
No. This page compares approaches — manual checking, classic SEO tools and GEO console — without naming any third-party product or making claims about them. We only describe what each method actually measures and what GEO console is capable of, so you can choose with full information.
Yes, the two are complementary. An SEO tool measures your positions and links on Google results pages. GEO console measures whether your brand is cited inside AI assistant answers. They are two distinct channels: the first doesn't see what happens in the second.
Yes. The instant test is free and needs no credit card: enter your domain and get a first visibility score in seconds. The Starter, Pro and Enterprise plans add continuous tracking, more engines, share of voice and results stabilized across multiple runs.
Free, no credit card — your first visibility score in seconds.
Test my site See pricing →